Pagan Librarian

thinking about libraries and information from a pagan perspective

  • Author

    Pagan Librarian

  • Library Use Survey

    If you identify as a Pagan, Witch, Druid, Otherkind, etc. and have a local library, please take a moment to complete this questionnaire!

    Go to Survey

  • Sign up to receive notifications of new posts from this blog via email.

    Join 2,603 other subscribers
  • Make a Connection!

    Pagan Librarian

    Are you Pagan? Are you a Librarian? Join the Pagan Librarians Group on Facebook today!

  • Archives

  • Categories

  • New Alexandrian Library

  • Copyright

    Creative Commons License
    Pagan Librarian Blog by Jessica Enget is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.
    Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://paganlibrarian.wordpress.com/about/
  • This is a Networked Blog

  • Blog Stats

    • 21,176 visits

Can Dewey Do It? Classifying books of pagan interest

Posted by Pagan Librarian on October 15, 2009

Courtesy of the State Library of Iowa

Courtesy of the State Library of Iowa

As a newbie librarian, I’ve come across several classification systems… For example, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system (000-900’s) that everyone has come in contact with and is used just about everywhere; and the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), which is a more expansive system than DDC used in many academic, research, or professional libraries.

But then there are bodies of knowledge that require greater care in their organization, such as the science of medicine. The National Library of Medicine (NLM) system was established to handle this great sum of specifically nuanced information in a way that was relevant and efficient for doctors and scientists.

While the NLM can be used by anyone, it is used to handle a specific body of information for a specific audience.

So while I’ve been enjoying my time exploring my free, limited-day trial of OCLC’s Online Web Dewey service, there’s been a question sitting in the back of my mind: if one were to establish a special interest collection, perhaps even a stand-alone library specifically to address pagan needs and interests, how would the books be organized, and what would the classification system look like? Would an existing classification system suffice, or is it a body of information that, like the science of medicine, could benefit from developing it’s own unique system?

Like any system, the DDC has received it’s share of criticms. But one that stood at the forefront of my mind was that the DDC was created with a Christian background. Would this background be a significant obstacle, or is it just a red herring?

With a pagan perspective, (“Is there something that could be found here of pagan interest?”) I very systematically began exploring the intricate subject breakdowns of the DDC, at times even getting 4-7 places to the right of the decimal point. I made note of my observations of specific words used (because the choice of a word is not taken very lightly in classification) and the placement of topics within the system.

I’m not saying that this isn’t something that can be further delved into; it can! But my initial thoughts after spending about a week digging… while a unique system may be more relevant for research-based collections, the majority of the Dewey Decimal Classification would suffice to organize a general collection of materials in a pagan centered library.

But wait! I don’t mean that you’d walk into this hypothetical pagan library and everything would be organized within 100-299… No, what I mean to say is that while currently mainstream public libraries do put most of their specifically pagan interest books in this area, in a pagan-centered library, these books would be given great enough attention that they could be spread nearly anywhere within the DDC.

It’s possible in this wide-world that there are public libraries out there that don’t act on a knee-jerk reaction of seeing the word “pagan” or “witchcraft” as the publisher’s overly simple subject heading and automatically slap it in the stacks between 100-299, but I haven’t personally seen many instances of this. For example, Kristen Madden’s book, “Festival Feasts” has “pagan” written on it, and often, –if I do find it– it’s put with all the other “pagan” books about spiritual/religious practices (100-299’s)… instead of cooking — even though the entire book is dedicated to recipe’s and menus! Why not put it in cooking (600’s)? Specifically, seasonal or holiday cooking (641.56)?

While it would be awesome for librarians or catalogers of mainstream public libraries to take a little more time investigating the actual purpose of a book beyond the special interest label, I’m not going to harp on them for what they presently do. Knee-jerk system though it may be, it works. Why? Because the collection of a public library as a whole is meant to serve the whole community. For the special interest groups within their community, it is likely they are doing their best to provide a service of convenience by trying to lump all the “special interest” books near together instead of all over the place.

BUT: if there ever comes to be a pagan-centered library, a special interest library, it’s very possible that the full range of the DDC could be utilized to better organize materials within the collection.

(Though I’m still interested in exploring what a unique, pagan-based classification system might look like…)

THOUGHTS???

6 Responses to “Can Dewey Do It? Classifying books of pagan interest”

  1. Dina said

    funny, i am an aspiring librarian and right now i am volunteering as a shelver. and have pondered the same thing as i go through the shelves. mythology, of course needs to be in our catalog. but then i find ancient egyptian, greek and roman culture elsewhere and there is lots of pagan fodder in there. this excludes the small section within religion and health and wellness where some modern day pagan books appear.

  2. Makarios said

    Hmph. In at least one instance, I’ve seen Huxley’s Crome Yellow classified under color technology.

    Are you at all acquainted with Ranganathan’s “colon classification?” You might want to explore the possibilities.

  3. jlenget said

    Makarios – no, I’ve yet to come in contact with Ranganathan’s Colon Classification (CC) until your mention of it. I just now looked it up to glance it over, and it’s caught my attention! The PMEST principle (personality; matter or property : energy . space ‘ time) makes me think it might be an excellent system to use when classifying actual items, such as crystals in a collection, and looks like it may hit a lot of “metaphysical” topics. Thanks for introducing me to this! I will have to make time to explore and write about this also.

  4. jlenget said

    Thanks for your comment, Dina! I’ve also seen what you described; that a lot of pagan-tagged materials are sometimes included with the classic cultures and mythologies. Everytime I go into a new library, I’m always curious to see how they shelve things.

  5. caelesti said

    I don’t if Dewey was so much created “from a Christian background” as it was designed with the assumptions of a predominantly Christian culture. I believe there have been similar criticism made about classification systems’ bias towards white/European culture, use of outdated terminology etc.

    You make a good point with the Festival Feasts example.
    Here’s an interesting question though- if it were a cookbook written from a Christian slant where would they put it?
    I think libraries need to classify things in a way by keeping in mind where would their patrons look first for something.
    While looking for pagan-related books, I generally try looking in more than one area, religion, history, anthropology and “New Age/alternative spirituality” for both academic & popular press books.

  6. I think that a thesaurus would have to be created for a Pagan library much as it is necessary with most special topic libraries (e.g. GLBT, labour, engineering, whatever). None of the schemes meant to cover all of human knowledge are specialized enough.

    My engineering-oriented library uses the Inspec Thesaurus as our base vocabulary with terms added from individual corporate projects (since the point is for people to be able to find things!)

    Back in the day in my cataloguing class I created a thesaurus for cataloging Celtic topics. It was an interesting exercise. Some friends and I are discussing starting a Pagan library here in Northern California and so this topic is definitely up for me.

Leave a comment